Labels:text | document | font | screenshot | menu | number OCR: Table 2. Comparison of farge programs with hypertext. Characteristics Barge programs Hypertext Comment Moskee or ot fois provide bath func: tonality and servicesat tov les can 'Sdes ou int diflex fit file spaces ;but in genatal expected; but offer little construce embor' concepts suchniss information iperioxt has novoncapt equivalent to hadings and can contain get allol threads encapsulation Limiting ser domains can of úkidstion: Modules are usually cours arminde some scode control *Developers cast pidesi separately and then baked to cre; cremepates separatenand develop them ate a program > Modules y potten In das Isita t'ilferuit tocis : Several fornis af linkage decent languages can you linked basis though auf are tesad on intersections; componentteuse; Dithereat proptarns cak musa modules Seresat documents icando corporate the same Reusable comochemis pronde and objects through static or cynamic Shab pane outnervis coules tor Uni links) or major motivation for better version !! infong. Mechanisms such as CORBA OV HTML Links:Suchtlinks @ so Tauss docus control atcommon Object Ftenvest choker menis on different $ gs Architecture) extends cust possibilities. Modules must be tested for their ind ?) Page development and maintona ice practicas *; Experience is potentially drensfere vidual properties as welt & their contis Would not chatenth accucios for either thorvidual button tothe integrated i hold; or integrated properties. Tools \ rholy based upon the make pete Ko agulvalent tools are those although some clear need for better management managecient adic'in separate hformation about link; tools how manane links and identity changes. of hypertext documents because kage from the worldles themselves Web vocunte als do hot readily separate ink; documents ch spar organiza tions: aus anforma ich from text since the usually n'the futuretarde programisierst embedded links are difficult to extract. Development tools: Mostobases of the life cycle nous have Writeweb ongeycreation tools are olarable Similarities further reinforce the soms toci support which usually pme including simplelexionsions: word; need for a bocar meli er ance don't vides ant abstrschon to assist users processorstand more in ag a ed packages; Some orcisdd abstractiones mans ton Instance, show a document's struc ine; Developcuent. Design methods and horatown's guide No abs ractions describing the overall st tucs Software develop mier methods: ProCOSSBS the development of large programs; itre cto ti pertext document have gamed and notations halle helped i morse particularly in top hr ly phasess often popularity euro methods guide large y an poc disciplined development practicess supplemento bu CASE JOURS MNOHOde document development. Architectural style No equivaleit has proved Help transfer previous experience does not exist \ though oroshcat ors inby necessary for hyperte d ) although among developers:These are generalis Podopt house styles for documentation. the lack ci formal architectural domain specific and directed to ward a styles may complicate sirale architectumax styles
(2000).iso/ieeec/8c1/brert102.gif){kind=small}
(2000).iso/ieeec/8c1/brert101.gif){kind=link}
(2000).iso/ieeec/8c1/falct101.gif){kind=link}